Reviews
- PSY 101 Week 7 Assignment 2 Case Study 2NOT RATED
5
- Pyschology
- PHI 210 Week 8 Discussion
- SCI 115 Week 6 Lab Quiz
- COMPENSATION PRACTICE
grammly say this paper is 99% plagerism
- Discussion Question - LEG 500 Wk 5
- HSA 599 Week 3 Case Study 1 Are Our Customer Liaisons Helping or Hurting?
Incorrect format for APA Style. No abstract. Did not utilize full title for a first introductory paragraph.
- week 4 eassay
- LEG 500 Week 4 Discussion Product Safety and Advertising
- Communication discussion
- Assignment 2: Probability Analysis
- Developing Persuasive Business Messages Part II
- Assignment 1: Retrospective Analysis of Personality NOT RATED
99% plagiarized paper. copied word by word from different websites. I don't recommend this tutor and I will never work with.
- FIN 534 wk 10 Discussion Question
Great job,nothing but an A answer
- M5A1: —The Case For, or Against, New Orleans
4 of 5
- prof-hayatNOT RATED
ok
- an Entity Relationship Diagram and detailed documentation describing the database design and structure
- Case Study—The Case of the Misguided Supervisors
- Assignment 1: Retrospective Analysis of Personality
I got a 0 on this paper, the teacher came back and had it flagged for plagiarism. This is the first paper I purchased out of 7 that this has happened to. I was told I would be reported to student services. Due to a 0 for the paper, me grade dropped from a 99% to a 78%. Hopefully I do not get kicked out of the class with only 2 weeks left in the semester. I DO NOT recommend this paper.
- Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists
This paper was completely plagiarized. It was copied and pasted word for word from The Knoxville Daily Sun, Safe Driving and Standardization of Cell Phone Regulations. I do not know how received 5 stars on this paper unless he is rating himself. Good luck using this tutor. Very disappointed!