4-1
a year ago
1
4-1Discussion_StrengthsandWeaknesses.pdf
4-1ReadingandResources3.html.zip
4-1GraduateDiscussionRubric.html.zip
- DavidC.Funder-ThePersonalityPuzzle8thEdition-WWNortonCoInc2019.pdf
4-1Discussion_StrengthsandWeaknesses.pdf
4-1 Discussion: Strengths and Weaknesses
For this discussion, you will be assigned a theorist or theorists according to your last name. Your instructor may reassign you to a different theorist as needed, so check the announcements for any revisions.
In your initial post, you will briefly describe your assigned theorists' approach to personality psychology. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of this approach and support your claims with research findings. Be sure to consider the validity and reliability of the research support you provide.
If the first letter of your last name is A–H, the theorist to evaluate is Rogers.
If the first letter of your last name is I–P, the theorist to evaluate is Kelly.
If the first letter of your last name is Q–Z, the theorists to evaluate are Deci and Ryan.
Respond to two peers who wrote about different theorists than you did in your initial post. Compare/contrast the strengths and weaknesses of their approaches to that of the theorist(s) you reviewed. Which theoretical approach seems more useful in contemporary personality psychology?
4-1ReadingandResources3.html.zip
Reading and Resources3.html
|
Required Resources |
Textbook: The Personality Puzzle, Chapter 12 As you read this chapter, consider the following questions:
- What does it mean to be alive and aware?
- Do past experiences shape who we are?
- How do the ways of thinking about personality discussed in the chapter differ from the views of Freud and the neo-Freudians?
How Humanistic Is Positive Psychology? Lessons in Positive Psychology From Carl Rogers’ Person-Centered Approach—It’s the Social Environment That Must Change This article compares humanistic and positive psychology approaches within the historical context of the development of the theories as well as the current applications of them. In the Shapiro Library, click on Full Text Finder on the left. If the page does not display, click on Open the page in a new window.
4-1GraduateDiscussionRubric.html.zip
Graduate Discussion Rubric.html
Graduate Discussion Rubric
Overview
Your active participation in the discussions is essential to your overall success this term. Discussion questions will help you make meaningful connections between the course content and the larger concepts of the course. These discussions give you a chance to express your own thoughts, ask questions, and gain insight from your peers and instructor.
Directions
For each discussion, you must create one initial post and follow up with at least two response posts.
For your initial post, do the following:
- Write a post of 1 to 2 paragraphs.
- In Module One, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete your initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Consider content from other parts of the course where appropriate. Use proper citation methods for your discipline when referencing scholarly or popular sources.
For your response posts, do the following:
- Reply to at least two classmates outside of your own initial post thread.
- In Module One, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Eastern.
- In Modules Two through Ten, complete your two response posts by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. of your local time zone.
- Demonstrate more depth and thought than saying things like “I agree” or “You are wrong.” Guidance is provided for you in the discussion prompt.
Discussion Rubric
Criteria | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Comprehension | Develops an initial post with an organized, clear point of view or idea using rich and significant detail (100%) | Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea using appropriate detail (90%) | Develops an initial post with a point of view or idea but with some gaps in organization and detail (70%) | Does not develop an initial post with an organized point of view or idea (0%) | 20 |
Timeliness | N/A | Submits initial post on time (100%) | Submits initial post one day late (70%) | Submits initial post two or more days late (0%) | 10 |
Engagement | Provides relevant and meaningful response posts with clarifying explanation and detail (100%) | Provides relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (90%) | Provides somewhat relevant response posts with some explanation and detail (70%) | Provides response posts that are generic with little explanation or detail (0%) | 20 |
Critical Thinking | Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (100%) | Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence (90%) | Draws logical conclusions (70%) | Does not draw logical conclusions (0%) | 30 |
Writing (Mechanics) | Initial post and responses are easily understood, clear, and concise using proper citation methods where applicable with no errors in citations (100%) | Initial post and responses are easily understood using proper citation methods where applicable with few errors in citations (90%) | Initial post and responses are understandable using proper citation methods where applicable with a number of errors in citations (70%) | Initial post and responses are not understandable and do not use proper citation methods where applicable (0%) | 20 |
Total: | 100% |
- Renewable Technology: Self-sufficiency of the housing scheme in terms of its energy use.A new rural housing development (500 houses) is to be established. As a renewable energy consultant, you have been commissioned to advise the developer on the potentia
- 500 words
- Research and Methodological (last minute)
- Hospital History . read $ disc
- week 7 discussion questions
- Module 1 Case 1 Strategic Review
- PROF. REYNOLDS
- Chapters 1-5 Human Growth and Development
- Prof Moses G
- English paper